My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0526_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0526_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 12:07:58 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 11:43:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br /> 10, Information which must he submitted for all applications: <br /> A. Application and Fee <br /> B. 8-1/2 x 1111 site Plan showing property lines, and location of all <br /> existing and proposed improvements, <br /> C. Written approval from owners of adjacent or nearby properties <br /> affected by the variance request. <br /> W <br /> D. ritten statement from the applicant explaining why the variance is <br /> necessary and what hardships are present. <br /> 11. Application Process: <br /> A. Applications and accompanying documents reviewed with Minor Variance <br /> Committee. Minor Variance Committee males recommendation to City <br /> Council. <br /> B. <br /> If Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommends approval of <br /> variance application then goes to city Council for final action, <br /> C. If Minor Variance Commiftee does not unanimously recommend approval <br /> or recommends denial, new application rust he made for a normal <br /> variance. <br /> 12. The above statements are true and correct to the hest of my knowledge. <br /> C� <br /> Signature <br /> ,V r A? �3 ;z, <br /> Telephone <br /> -,- q <br /> Date <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.