My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0413_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0413_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 3:12:42 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 3:03:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Roseville to issue r�i <br /> 2-� It is the policy of the qty nor variances when there is a <br /> of Ro <br /> hardship or practical difficulty, Provided the property erty is locate <br /> d in an R-' , Single <br /> Family Residential District, and used for residential purposes. <br /> • fires a rr�inir�urr� side hard setback of five feet <br /> .4 section 'l�'1 .�'l���r its bode, requires <br /> for parcels platted before May 21, 1 959. <br /> • requires a minimum side yard setback of five feet <br /> Section �� .o�������, i bode, re�u�r <br /> for a residential driveway. <br /> MINOR RI COMMIU-0 <br /> ' the required application form, sketch of the <br /> The request for the variance included � <br /> ,� � Cement from the applicant, and r�iten <br /> and proposed driveway,, written statement . <br /> property � � he variance (Leon Pezyk <br /> roe owner affected by t <br /> approval from the adjacent property Rp <br /> at 2085 Harnline Avenue). <br /> ' � this request on Tuesday, March 1, 1998, <br /> The Minor variance Committee reviewed �l <br /> unanimously recommended approval <br /> of a minor variance to reduce the side <br /> and ]� a one-car addition and <br /> o three feet for the purpose of constructing <br /> yard setback t findings: <br /> • 095 Hamline Avenue, based on the following <br /> expanding n� a driveway at <br /> 1 ture trees on the parcel, the topography of the. The presence of numerous mature <br /> parcel, and the location of the existing attached garage creates a practical <br /> difficulty for the applicants. <br /> • will not exceed 6 feet at the property line; <br /> . The �r��ith of the driveway F <br /> however, ter e driveway will also be located less than the required five feet <br /> from the south property line. <br /> * on with the general purpose and intent of <br /> The proposed variance 'is in harm � <br /> . R � 10 of the i ode (Zoning). <br /> the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title <br /> of adversely affect the public health, safety, or <br /> �. The variance, if granted, will n ]� <br /> general welfare. <br /> SUGGESTED nQN <br /> - ri frerer�s request for a minor variance to <br /> � motion, approve Stephen and Lo . • . <br /> �.'l ]� � and a driveway to three feet for <br /> e and setback of a garage addition y <br /> reduce the sad � - • one-car attached <br /> ctin a one-car addition to an existing the purpose of constructing <br /> garage at 2095 Had one Avenue, bas <br /> ed on the e fndings of the Minor Variance <br /> Committee outlined in section . of this report. <br /> • valiance lication; written statement from applicant} written <br /> Attachments: Property location map, mirror pp of ro e . <br /> e owners, sketch of property, photograph p p <br /> consent from adjacent property �• Decision deadline is ��� , ����. <br /> 60-day Time Limit:Application accepted on March } M:\RCA\PF2z199 <br /> Prepared Icy: Kim L. Lee, Al P ) <br /> pF# 99J-RCA(04/1 3/98)-Page 2 of� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.