My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0316.ws_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0316.ws_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 1:01:26 PM
Creation date
10/10/2011 12:57:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2) Combine the aria f v O and �w O and form a new watershed district. <br /> new board, initially appointed by Bw R and then by Ramsey County, would need to <br /> hire a staff or contract for services with some existing agency. To date, Ramsey County <br /> Public works Ramsey County water and Soil Conservation District, and RVVMWD have <br /> expressed an interest in providing a.dninistrative and technical support. Landuses in this <br /> combined watershed are generally urban. <br /> It is my opinion that the second option'is in Roseville's best interest. The CRWMO and <br /> WRWMO are distinctl y different from RV5AWD with regard to tax capacity, general <br /> topography and development. If our watershed were combined with , it 'is likely that <br /> � <br /> tames g enerated from our relatively urban area would subsidize water resource solutions in more <br /> suburban watersheds and that we would have less direct control over watershed district activities. <br /> Please schedule a discussion of this issue for the March 16, 1998 City Council Worksession <br /> Meeting. If we are able to agree on the best option for Roseville, I will ask the Council to <br /> approve a resolution stating the City's position on March 3,l 998. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.