Laserfiche WebLink
Kim Lee <br /> 2/16/98 <br /> There are concerns with traffic flow and management that have not been <br /> adequately investigated. The easement concept suggested allows two-way traffic <br /> from County Road B across the westerly portion of the affected properties to the <br /> northwest corner of the McDonald's property. Easement traffic would continUE? <br /> east-rest through the northerly drive lane of the McDonald's parking area. Nothing <br /> has been defined for McDonald's regarding the impact of these additional traffic <br /> movements unrelated to its business, In addition, tiro-way traffic along the westerly <br /> portion of KFC would impact their drive-thru operation. The current Arby's site <br /> could accommodate tiro-way traffic, but their recently approved re-development <br /> project does not adequately make that provision. <br /> McDonald's reiterates its willingness to cooperate in the discussion surrounding are <br /> agreement to create cross access easements. However, the agreement needs to <br /> he uniform and created simultaneously for all affected. Given these concerns, <br /> McDonald's asks that staff Recommendation 4.1.9 he removed from the <br /> Requested Action on the consideration of this Conditional Use Permit. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> 14,x, / <br /> Craig Barnes <br /> Construction Department Manager <br /> Minneapolis Region <br /> co nstlbamesftosevl e4.dac 2 <br />