My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0310_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0310_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 1:45:37 PM
Creation date
10/10/2011 1:23:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR U I ACTION <br /> DATE: 3110198 <br /> ITEM CVO: F-2 <br /> Depaqrnent Approval, Manager Reviewed, Agenda Section: <br /> ' Reports and Recommendations <br /> +r <br /> item es ri p Lion: Acceptance of Bid for Acorn Park Building <br /> BA RO D <br /> PIP included the replacement of the park shelter building at Acorn Park. The <br /> The 1 � p <br /> Council l re uested that the building be upgraded to a higher quality structure consistent <br /> with the recommendations from VISTA 2000 and the Parks and Retreat i o n Infrastructure <br /> Committee for durable high h q ual ity buildings to service the current and projected programs <br /> as outlined in the Parks and Recreation System Plan. <br /> } <br /> The firm of sanders Wacker and Bergly was hired to develop plans and specifications for <br /> the building. The consultants and staff reviewed the concept plans at the July Council <br /> Work Session. This building is intended to be a standardized prototype for 6 other park <br /> buildings that are in the long-range plan to be replaced in the next 15 years. <br /> � <br /> (see Bids were received attached summary page) from 11 firms for the construction of the <br /> Acorn Pam shelter building. In all of the options, Ebert Construction is the low bidder. The <br /> established budget project ud et for the 'ect i s $175,000. In developing the bid package, the <br /> J <br /> consultants determined that the current construction market would probably cause the <br /> plans, as draw n, to be over the budgeted amount. They developed 10 deduct alternates <br /> that accepted could be to bring the price closer to the budgeted figure. <br /> Options <br /> has <br /> Staff completed analysis of the resutts and organized the following options-. <br /> p an <br /> #1. Reject all bids and determine whether to a) rebid the project with a design that will <br /> definitel y be'within the budget or b) abandon the project. <br /> Accept the low bid for the entire project which would have these features: <br /> 1,000 sq. ft <br /> of Inside space 8 feet of roof overhang <br /> 5 tables/7 benches outside under overhang exterior drinking fountain <br /> metal roof <br /> " laminated safety glass <br /> concrete apron surroundin g building `� seating/storage cabinets <br /> roof cu p <br /> ola rubber tile floor <br /> battery powered-auto flush valves in restroom borrowed light frame with tempered glass <br /> exposed wood laminated anterior beams/deck i nc '' restroom s. storaoe room and to u n oe room <br /> P <br /> The cost of this option is: $248,900, Additional funds would need to be allocated from <br /> the Recreational Infrastructure funds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.