1998_0223_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5. A request to divide the lot into two parcels was denied 1975; ho never, the official record does not indicate why the request was denied. 6. The proposed variance from the lot area and width requirements is ro in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). V@ riances__from both,.the minim rn l t width and the minimum lot area would be needed. and.the resulting lgt would not be compatible with the neighborhood., (Change in language re recommended by the Planning Commission) 7 The proposed variance from the lot area and width requirements, if granted, will adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare. (Change in language recommended by the Planning Commission) STAFF E D f 4.1 used on the findings outlined in Section 3.1 of this report, staff recommends that the request be approved with the following provisions: 1. A sanitary sewer utility servicing plan for the existing house must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer, and the relocation of the service line must be accomplished prior to the lot split being finalized by the City and recorded. 2. Additional aright-of-way easements/dedications for County Road B (10 feet) and Burke Avenue (15 feet) must be dedicated prior to the lot split being finalized by the City and recorded. 3. The deferred assessment of$1,345.09 must be paid prig to recording the lot split. pLANNING COAM fs fob ACTION 5.+1 on February 1, 1998, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the rY request. Marlene and John ICI ichels were present to answer questions and p rovid e additional information. Two letters were received in opposition to the request (Dan and Mary dean Weyandt at 982 County Road B and Brian Fitzgerald and Christine obon at 970 county Road 13). Three residents also spoke in opposition to the (Jim re uest Darner at 958 County Road E, Brian Fitzgerald at 970 oumy Road g B, and colleen Danner at 958 County Road 13). 5.2 The Planning Commission discussed the width and area of other lots in the neighborhood, hour,the proposed lots would line up with the lots to the west, which lots in the neighborhood could be split, homer similar requests throughout the community have been treated, the denial of a similar lot split request for this parcel in 1975, and the lack of a hardship for this request, PF#2983-RCA(02/23/98)- Page 3 of 4