My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_1118_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_1118_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 2:58:54 PM
Creation date
10/10/2011 2:18:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request for Council Action <br /> Date: November 18,2002 <br /> Item Number: VIII, F. <br /> Department Approval Manager Approval Agenda Section <br /> 7 Reports/Recommendations <br /> Item Description: <br /> Accepting Proposal for Residential Recycling Service <br /> Background <br /> Roseville established a curbside recycling program in July 1987. The curbside recycling program includes all <br /> single family homes, duplexes, triplexes, four-plexes and townhomes. The program began with once a month <br /> pickup and the frequency has changed until it reached the current every other week collection. Also more types <br /> of materials have been gradually added to the list of items collected. Despite increases in frequency of <br /> collection and types of material accepted, there has been very little growth in Roseville's recycling program <br /> during the past ten years. <br /> Currently residents pay $1.75 per month for recycling. The resident fee is subsidized by an annual SCORE <br /> grant of more than $60,000 from Ramsey County and by a recycling fee charged to multi-family complexes that <br /> are not included in the program. <br /> On June 11, 2001 the City Council established a resident committee to update the 1991 report Options for <br /> Residential Waste Collection and Recycling Report for Roseville, Minnesota. The City Council charged the <br /> Residential Solid Waste and Recycling Citizens Advisory Committee (RSWRCAC) with updating the April <br /> 1991 Report and to "evaluate the existing residential waste collection services and explore opportunities for <br /> improvement." <br /> The RSWRCAC presented its Report to the City Council on May 20, 2002. In the Report, members said the <br /> participation rate and tonnage of recycling collected in Roseville's curbside recycling program have remained <br /> fairly stagnant over the past ten years. Meanwhile we are all generating more garbage. Each Minnesotan <br /> produced, on average, 1.14 tons of garbage in 2000; that's up from 0.93 tons in 1993. Much of that waste is <br /> paper that could be recycled and organic material that could be composted. <br /> RSWRCAC members felt Roseville residents should generate less garbage. One of the ways to do that is to <br /> increase the amount of waste that is recycled. Members believe that making recycling more convenient will <br /> lead to more people participating in the recycling program. They looked at different options to improve <br /> convenience and participation in the recycling program and included those options in their report. <br /> First, the Committee recommended Roseville comply with State law and ensure residents of apartments, <br /> condominiums and manufactured home parks have the opportunity to recycle at the place they live. Members <br /> felt the best way to do that would be to expand the City's recycling program to include multi-family complexes. <br /> The Committee also put forward three options on residential curbside collection for the Council to consider: <br /> continue with the City's current two-sort system with bi-weekly collection and enhanced and expanded <br /> recycling education, switch to every week collection, or switch to a single-stream system with bi-weekly <br /> collection. The Report lists the pros and cons of each option (see attachment). The Committee recommended <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.