Laserfiche WebLink
.. <br /> `` <br /> ' -Residents are familiar with it <br /> -Participation r ates a n d tonnages <br /> es 1 <br /> f <br /> are stagnant <br /> in <br /> . .. . <br /> -Less residual and out throw <br /> .................... <br /> ........-. <br /> h collection cost <br /> Lower rocessin cost <br /> p g <br /> _ -Difficulty of g ettin g <br /> bins to the 4 <br /> n can bemoaiMd t o add curb <br /> . ... 11 n wheels <br /> lids <br /> -Storage concerns inhibiting full <br /> -Lowest cost ($205 per participation <br /> household, per month) <br /> 00.0 -Abates storage concerns because -Difficulty getting bins to curb <br /> weekly <br /> C..... of le build up <br /> collection cost <br /> o ion residual and out throws <br /> -Less convenient <br /> -Lower processing cost, <br /> -Increased truck traffic <br /> can be `modified to add lids <br /> and wheels 8% `of residents surveyed said <br /> every other week collection is often <br /> -Higher Cost per house- <br /> hold, per month) <br /> -Convenient (no sorting) -Higher cost of processing <br /> Wheeled and covered containers <br /> - -Higher residual and out throw rates <br /> � <br /> Stream g <br /> -Lower cost of collection -Only one vendor <br /> -Provides additional storage space -If City doesn't own bins, would <br /> have to buy a new set if new vendor <br /> -Less truck traffic because trucks <br /> don't fill as since they can -Waste Management has less t <br /> compact material tive to recover glass and sell it to a <br /> manufacturer for recycling <br /> -Higher participation/ More ton- <br /> nage collected -Residents surveyed split 50150 on <br /> whether they want it <br /> -Highest cost ($2.25 per household <br /> per month) <br /> 63 <br />