Laserfiche WebLink
irvie�k rna�, need to be �%idened i the distant future but <br /> l�arnse�� ount� bel,e��� that l~a _ <br /> F ! � any. lannine � LJld be several years away with <br /> has no idea when Apparent iv- p - . <br /> • t 1�orT�es bordering Fa,r •ie ill be Further impacted <br /> construction several years aver the .. . <br /> • <br /> widening Those homeowners future roadway by any sigrufcant increased traffic and any <br /> for <br /> need to be treated fairly what <br /> miti at,on or alternatives are poss,ble and ,� it possible � <br /> tan for this' is expected to be discussed further <br /> the County or i t to y p <br /> Traffic counts are not known. Speeding eedi n by neighbors and others is a concern and occurs <br /> � <br /> roadway make i s easy t o go fast. The concept of traffic <br /> because the hills and straight y eds <br /> calrnYrig changes have <br /> been discussed as a way to cause drivers to naturally reduce spe <br /> Further discussion is anticipated. <br /> 3) RJECOMMENDAT'I'ONS ON LAND USE ZON ES <br /> In or near the neighborhood. and. t�' <br /> Charge- Should there be a c han., ge in land use zones r� <br /> so, why and to what other uses') <br /> clamtruaf <br /> • - ro ertv fro€,n Fairview p to and including the cold <br /> The city has recently purchased this property� st <br /> owner had the ro erty for sale and there apparently was interest storage building.. The � P p to <br /> developing it as <br /> c tnrnercial with Fairview Avenue frontage, The c� wasproposing <br /> tore a and passive public uses and was considering <br /> purchase it for seasonal storage p purchased so it <br /> • force agreed with city plans and that it should be pu <br /> improvements. The task o <br /> could not be developed. <br /> Rnfirc NCW*QrhQW-* . . - development of the entire neighborhood has <br /> possibility of future comn�erc�al�busrness developm <br /> Thep d. ft has been reinforced by the <br /> always been rumored and pondered by the neighborhoo <br /> • r�vo onions of this residential neighborhood into the <br /> previous sale and redevelopment of p <br /> existing southern ret a <br /> it centers. However it appears that an approximate cost of <br /> rnMon to purchase the remaining 176 6 homes(43 acres) and the 3 businesses on these 71 <br /> r commercial redevelopment econonlically feasible. The <br /> acres is likely too much to make con�rr� p <br /> limited traffic access on Snelling llin and Fairview may well be a negative for any <br /> redevelopment. <br /> . in surrounded by current and redeveloping business <br /> Lorin the add oirung neighbors and being <br /> Losing 'n neighborhood can continue to remain Viable <br /> fosters the cone about how the rern�ura g <br /> • ate the nei hborhood infrastructure and moderate <br /> and maintain property values. To g n <br /> and the number of homes sold per fee <br /> value homes have Sri well maintained gear has <br /> ` h most may not anti a clear direction to resolve <br /> average. If not redeveloped in total, vrtnc � <br /> neighborhood problems and mitigate impacts is needed. <br /> 24 <br />