My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0126_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0126_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 11:18:25 AM
Creation date
10/11/2011 11:00:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�! <br /> dor- <br /> T DEVELOPMENT LTD. <br /> January 16, 1998 <br /> Ilia Fax(490-2931) and <br /> Regular Mail <br /> Kim L. Lee, AIC P <br /> City Planner <br /> City of Roseville <br /> 2660 Civic Centre Drive <br /> Roseville, MN 55113-1899 <br /> Rev- Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application <br /> 2218-2240 Hamline Avenue <br /> PF#2 78 <br /> Dear Ms. Lee: <br /> The purpose of this letter <br /> is to inform you that we are withdra ring our application to <br /> amend the Comprehensive �`ve P Ian designation of the subject properties from medium <br /> • limited business and, ac rdinglyr the application should be <br /> density residential #� l�nn <br /> r emoved from the January 26 city Council agenda. <br /> • application because it is obvious that it is impossible to obtain <br /> v'�e are #hdraw�n� our app <br /> • merits of our proposal in the face of substantial anti-Everest bias <br /> a fair hearing on the rrrer� � � <br /> • ' and the current Council, exemplified by council member <br /> exhibited Nted by r staff a _ <br /> oe <br /> deke at Wednesday nights Planning Commission meeting. <br /> contacts with the City concerning the Hamline Avenue propel <br /> brief regrew our � t � t . <br /> over the past several months demonstrates that staff and the City Council are intent on <br /> • • • disadvantaging Everest, rather than providing a neutral forum for <br /> discrediting and drsadvar� � � . <br /> redevelopment opportunity on its merits. In the course of informal meetings <br /> a redevel�pr�judging arl�oz in October of this past year, l�r, <br /> and conversations with City Manager Steve <br /> arkozy gave contradictory <br /> indications of how an office redevelopment proposal might <br /> i • First Mr. arko� stated an office redevelopment concept <br /> be 'Initiated with the fly. ]� <br /> could be considered wit' hin the contextIL of the City's annual Comprehensive Plan <br /> updating process which was to occur in the fall of 997- later he stated there was no <br /> such Comprehensive updating ive P lan u datin planned for the remainder of 1 997 nor any <br /> identifiable time period going into the future. <br /> 665 Lono, Lake Rt)a l <br /> -Su;te 134-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.