My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0126_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0126_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 11:18:25 AM
Creation date
10/11/2011 11:00:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR CITY C,0UNC& ACTION <br /> DATE: 01/26/98 <br /> ITEM : C-1 <br /> art ant Approval: 9 pp <br /> roved: Agenda Section: <br /> e CONSENT <br /> • Everest Development, Ltd. <br /> Request uest for withdrawal of application for <br /> If �esorip#Ion. ent to change designation of seven <br /> parcels along Comprehensive Play Amendment • � . <br /> � � Medium Density Residential to <br /> Limited Business PF#2978 NONE= <br /> from <br /> REQUEST" <br /> 1.1 E <br /> verest Development, <br /> Ltd, has informed the i that it is withdrawing its <br /> application <br /> to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan to change the designation of seven <br /> parcels of land from M edium Density Residential to Limited Business. <br /> ' � olio of the its to take official action to accept the withdrawal of an <br /> 1. It Is the p i including amendments to the City <br /> • r Ian action, Inol <br /> application for to I the provisions of <br /> It is also the policy of the It apply p <br /> Comprehensive Plan � to requests for <br /> Section 1015.o5 of the City Cod � <br /> rehearing s outlined Irk states ;`No <br /> � �IOrI 1�1�.�� of the I#]� bode <br /> Comprehensive Plan amendments. Section' � in sip <br /> p or the rezoning of land �nrlth (6) <br /> entitled to resent any petition f <br /> person shall be the same reonl where <br /> of a petition seeking substantially bstan tiall . . <br /> months from the receipt p provision shall not <br /> . • • been enacted upon and denied.. Ti h is <br /> such original petition has b - • n withdrawn. <br /> • ' ion where a former etntion has been <br /> affect an right to resent a etlt <br /> (Ord. 281), 3-22-1960) <br /> 1,0 � D- <br /> affiliate, �iarrnllne Avenue Properties! <br /> Ltd, on behalf of Its • <br /> .� Everest Development, henslve Plan to change the land <br /> ed an amendment to the City Comprehensive LLB, requested use designation of seven p arcels of land from Medium Density Residential (MR) to <br /> Limited Business (LE). <br /> hearing on this request on January 14, <br /> ' omr�.nssnon held a public hea � <br /> . The Planning � e request be denied. <br /> 1998, and adopted a reoorrnrnendattion that th � <br /> 2.3 In a letter date d January 16, 1998, Everest Development, Ltd., <br /> informed ed the City <br /> that It was withdrawing Its application and stated that the application should be <br /> removed from the January �6 1998,� �, pity Council meeting. <br /> ED. f N IL A T�oN <br /> • Everest Development's application for a <br /> the wlthndrawal of Ever p <br /> 1 B resolution, accept <br /> comprehensive plan amendment. <br /> Attach ments, <br /> Letter from Everest oevelopment� Ltd and re <br /> solution. M:1RCA1PF2978 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.