My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0126_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0126_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 11:18:25 AM
Creation date
10/11/2011 11:00:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Margolis Nursery for a future retail tenant. Bradley Real Estate is also proposing <br /> to further improve the property in the future by relocated some electrical utilities <br /> underground, controlling all site lighting by central time clock and photo cell, <br /> installing additional landscaping within the development, and installing a new eight <br /> foot fence adjacent to the residential area along Dionne Avenue. <br /> In conjunction with the review of this request, it was determined that the proposed <br /> drive-thru for n y der Drug is a permitted ancillary use and can be approved <br /> administratively through the building permit process; therefore, this aspect of site <br /> development is not included in the request for concept development plan approval. <br /> 2.4 Section 1008 of the City Code outlines the requirements and procedures for a <br /> planned unit development, including the coordination with subdivision regulations. <br /> Section 1102 of the city Code outlines the requirements and procedures for the <br /> subdivision (platting) of property, including the data necessary for preliminary plat <br /> review. <br /> OVER VIEW ofPR <br /> 3.1 Staff has been working with Bradley Real Estate on this proposal since early <br /> September; therefore, there are numerous versions of the site development plan. <br /> In order to facilitate explanation of these on-going discussions and the process, <br /> each of the site p lans have been attached to this report and numbered as follows: <br /> 1) original plan submitted by BIDE (09/08/97) <br /> p <br /> ) <br /> Lar enteur Avenue Streetscape concept plan for this area (02/97) <br /> 3) alternative plan prepared by D U on behalf of City (11/27/97) <br /> 4) alternative plan prepared by DJR on behalf of BRE (12/10/97) <br /> 5) suggested revisions prepared by IDBU on behalf of City (12/22/97) <br /> ) plan for Taco Bell prepared by DJ R on behalf of BRE (dated 01/02/98) <br /> ) R <br /> landsca a plan prepared by stein on behalf of BRE (dated 01/07/98) <br /> When a specific site development plan is referenced in this report, the number <br /> assigned to the plan will be shown in parenthesis behind the reference. <br /> The Planning Commission held a sketch plan review of this request on November <br /> 1997. The original overall site development plan (#1), concept elevation of <br /> pylon signs, concept building elevations for the center, and a project narrative were <br /> reviewed. Tim Prinsen of Bradley Real Estate provided an overview of the project <br /> proposed ro osed and answered questions. The Planning omission discussed the <br /> ■ F <br /> need for upgrading n the center, the appearance of the corner as this intersection is <br /> ply � <br /> gateway .�into the community,, preferred design elements for all buildings and <br /> si na a the inclusion of design elements from the Larpenteur Avenue streetscape <br /> � l� <br /> Master Plan, concerns with the flog of traffic on the Taco Bell site and the need for <br /> a traffic analysis,sis and the need for City financial participation in project. <br /> P F# 96 3- RCA(01126/98)- Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.