My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0112_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0112_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 12:08:14 PM
Creation date
10/11/2011 11:54:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ii. <br /> Vi <br /> City of Roseville <br /> planning Commission Minutes <br /> July 12, 1995 <br /> larger d �� public ublic entrance, office and handicapped toilet facilities. It also results in <br /> the loss of 3 bedrooms. Michael Falk stated that, In order to maintain the current bed <br /> Good Samaritan is proposing to reconfigure existing space and add approximately <br /> count, � F <br /> 12 feet to the northeast residential wing,reducing the setback from to 12 feet, Two <br /> additional bedrooms will be added in this area. <br /> pointed out tha. some <br /> Mr. Falk t parking stalls would be eliminated, but the site would <br /> F g <br /> con � F <br /> continue to provide spaces in excess of the city's requirements. <br /> summarized the engineering staff s connn ents including the need for review of <br /> �•. Fad g <br /> in plans b en ineerin staff at the time the building permit is applied for, and <br /> final grading F y g g . <br /> • Street or a contribution be <br /> needs to be constructed along filbert qtr <br /> that ether a sidewalk <br /> nude to the sidewalk fund as required <br /> City Planner Falk recommended that the planning Commission recommend the approval <br /> foot setback variance request because the proposal would not result in traffic <br /> �f the 1 � <br /> vis.b�•li ty problem,the additions will match the current building, and would allow the <br /> � <br /> nursin g home to maintain their existing bed count. <br /> Chi <br /> an wietecli a lied if the existing building would have to be brought into <br /> with the current design standards. I r. Jopke responded that they would not <br /> compliance g <br /> F <br /> have to comply,because the expansion would not increase the size of the building by 10 <br /> percent or add 20 percent to the market value of the property. <br /> F F <br /> tioned the size and Member wail goes type of landscaping proposed. <br /> project,the j ex <br /> Toni Dun�vell, Architect for lained the alternatives that they have F <br /> developed to improve update`rn and u date the facility. Mr. Dunwell indicated that because of the <br /> home expansions and the demand for nursing hone beds, <br /> current moratorium on nursing F <br /> important se an beds due to the remodeling and expansion <br /> this facfli not lose' that it�ern o�ant that y <br /> F <br /> . Mr. Dunwell pointed out that the proposed expansion has the least impact <br /> of the facility. F <br /> • t load . Mr. Dunwell described the landscapi <br /> on the intersection ng <br /> of Albert and County <br /> cted would be larger than the existing due to wing to <br /> and that the new bedrooms constructed g <br /> meet current standards. <br /> r <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.