Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 26, 2011 <br /> Page 17 <br /> revised, as requested by the City Council, to include the Applewood Senior Hous- <br /> ing Project (Block 11) that was now almost completed, with the developer re- <br /> quired to complete public infrastructure entirely at their expense in the amount of <br /> $54,000. <br /> There were no City Council or public comments related to this item. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that any 2011 amendments beyond 2010 were shown on the <br /> chart. <br /> Pust moved, Johnson seconded, approval of 2011 amendments to the "Infrastruc- <br /> ture Improvements for the Twin lakes AUAR Area—Final Report;" as detailed in <br /> the RCA dated September 26, 2011. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Pust; McGehee; Johnson; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> b. Consider an Ordinance Creating the Twin Lakes Overlay District <br /> Mayor Roe noted that staff had presented this item for discussion at a previous <br /> meeting, and that now it was before the City Council for action. <br /> Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon briefly summarized the re- <br /> quested action, as detailed in the RCA dated September 26, 2011. Mr. Trudgeon <br /> noted that the Planning Commission had reviewed the ordinance at their Septem- <br /> ber meeting, and that their only revisions had been of a housekeeping nature and <br /> had been incorporated into the most recent draft being presented tonight. Mr. <br /> Trudgeon noted that the City Attorney had worked extensively on the ordinance, <br /> and that it had been designed with the purpose of helping the City implementation <br /> AUAR mitigation efforts by providing a framework to do so. <br /> Councilmember Willmus sought clarification on provisions and the consequences <br /> if all the improvements were not made in previously-approved documents and as <br /> addressed within a development contract; and whether there was a remedy for <br /> those developers in the future. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon advised that as development agreements came forward, everything <br /> was negotiable based on circumstances and identified improvements. Mr. <br /> Trudgeon clarified that the improvements were identified and inevitable, even <br /> thought it wasn't a certainty that they would happen within a certain time frame. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that the identified intersections were busy today, and that all <br /> items were open for discussion, as normal, as part of any development agreement <br /> to determine if another solution was evident; however, he noted that unless an ap- <br /> propriate venue other than ordinance level was indicated, such as another date, <br />