Laserfiche WebLink
Ra v believes that Fairview rnav need to he � tdened in the distant future but <br /> �'nse� you n t} <br /> when arentl�,- anv planning would be se�-eral years a 'av with <br /> has no idea �� <br /> be rt her impacted <br /> construction several ears after that Homes bordering F ai rv'cam will <br /> � <br /> by any <br /> significant increased traffic and and• future roadway widening Those homeowners <br /> deed to be treated fairly- what mitigation or alternatives are possible and is it possible for <br /> �y <br /> he County or City to plan for this9 It is expected to he discussed further <br /> oakerest Md Rose Place Traffic! <br /> 1 <br /> are not known. Speeding by neighbors and others is a concern and occurs <br /> Traffic counts � <br /> because the hid � roadway is and straight road make is easy to go fast. The concept of traffic <br /> � <br /> a <br /> calming changes have been discussed as a way to cause drivers to naturally reduce speeds_ <br /> Further discussion is anticipated. <br /> RE OMME D T11ONS ON LAND USE ZONES <br /> Charge- there be a change in land use zones in or near the neighborhood, arid, if <br /> so, why and to what other uses" <br /> purchased this roe from Fairview up to and including the cold <br /> The city has recently � � � . <br /> storage <br /> building. The owner had the property for We and there apparently was interest in <br /> developing it as commercial with Fairview avenue frontage. The city was proposing to <br /> it for seasonal storage and passive public uses and was considenng <br /> purchase � � i <br /> improvements. The task force agreed with city plans and that it should be purchased so t <br /> could not be developed. <br /> . commercial/business development of the entire neighborhood has <br /> The possibility of futu r e <br /> p y <br /> arrays been rumored <br /> and pondered b the neighborhood. It has been reinforced by the <br /> of two onions of this residential neighborhood into the <br /> previous sale and redevelopment P <br /> it centers. However} it appears that an approximate cost of 20 <br /> existing southern retail � these �� <br /> ' purchase the remaining 176 homes(43 acres) and the 3 businesses on t e <br /> million to � <br /> acres is likely too much to <br /> make conunercial redevelopment economically feasible. The <br /> limited traffic g <br /> access on Snelling and Fairview may well be a negative for any <br /> redevelopment. <br /> and being surrounded by current and redeveloping business <br /> Losing the adjoining neighbors g <br /> how the remaining fosters the concern about g Neighborhood can continue to remain viable <br /> property and inairmaiproperty values. To date the neighborhood infrastructure and moderate <br /> has been <br /> value pontes <br /> have been well maintained and.the number of homes sold per year <br /> average, If not redeveloped in total which most may not want, a clear direction to resolve <br /> neighborhood problems and mitigate impacts is needed. <br /> g <br /> 4 <br />