1993_0927_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Ilk i application be referred to the Planning Commission for consideration of the new plan. The discussion centered around the fact that the propert.. is zoned I-1, Industrial, but on the Roseville Comprehensive Land Use Guide plan, the property is designated for future business development. The question arose that by improving the building for its existing industrial use, would such action postpone the long range development of the property. Members of the City Council discussed the idea of an interim use permit for this property. In this way, the property owners would have some economic use of the building but a special use permit would not be allowed to continue in perpetuityc 4110 The Planning Commission, in their reconsideration of Boyer Ford Truck's request for a special use permit, had new information to consider. That information includes the following: low Boyer Ford Trucks has submitted a schedule of improvements to this site to bring it into compliance with Roseville design standards for industrial districts in support of their request for a special use permit. The City council has stressed the importance of the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designation for this area for future business/office development. The Roseville City Code provides the opportunity to use an interim use permit process which would allow a use for a particular parcel of land for a specific period of time. S. The Planning commission moved to recommend approval of Boyer Ford Trucks request for reconsideration of a. special use permit to do body work and painting of vehicles, i n addition to. engine repair at 1975 Oakc re st Avenue with the following conditions: a, That the application be for an interim use permit for a period of 10 gears* b, That staff approve a schedule of improvements to bring the site into compliance. c. That staff approve a landscape Man with the addition of total screening along the south side of the parking lot* The vote on this motion was three members voting in favor and three members voting opposed. Members of the Planning Commission indicated that while there was not a definitive recommendation to forward to the city Council, the issues had been presented and discussed. Alternatives: l,. Deny the proposed based on the finding that the proposal is not consistent with- the city's design .standards chapter of the Roseville zoning ordinance* + 2, Approve the modified request as an interim use permit with a specify.