My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0426_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0426_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 9:23:28 AM
Creation date
10/18/2011 11:58:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W <br />To* Steven Sarkozy, city Manager <br />From. Steven D,, Gatlin, Director of Public Works <br />RE: CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION CONS I DERATION FOR AMENDMENT <br />To CURRENT POLICY FOR SELECTING AND RETAINING CONSULTING <br />ENGINEERS <br />Date: April 14, 1993 <br />Background: In 1990, the City Counc i 1 adopted a policy for <br />selecting andLretaining consulting engineerse The policy was <br />used as a basis fpr selecting the three existing municipal <br />engineering consultants who serve Roseville in our municipal <br />engineering pool The process was also used to select one soil and <br />g g <br />eotechnical engineering firm which provides these services to <br />the citys <br />The policy provides that the initial selection shall be for a <br />period of three years and after the three year contract period <br />expires, a new selection process Faust be repeated. We would have <br />the option of retaining the same three firms, adding new firms to <br />the pool to replace existing firms, or amending the policy. <br />it is suggested that the policy needs minor amendments to "fine <br />tune" the process to provide better engineering services while <br />maintaining competitive fees* <br />Initially, staff found that while we were generbLlly well served <br />with the three general municipal engineering firms in'a pool <br />concept, limit ing our selection of firms to just the pool <br />prevented us from optimizing available technical expertise in <br />specific project specialties* Initially, the process we used to <br />select the firms required that each of the three firms be able to <br />provide the full spectrum of required engineering services* To <br />meet our needs, if the firms did not have in -house expertise, <br />they formed joint ventures with other firms to provide the <br />outside services not available within the firm. While this <br />apprbach.provided the full range of services from each firm,, it <br />limited the city's ability to select firms from outside the pool <br />to provide these services if desired. <br />We believe a more appropriate method of handling this would be to <br />increase the number of firms in the pool but use a similar <br />process to initially establish the pool. This will allow us to <br />have more than one firm to select from for individual, technical <br />proj <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.