My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0322_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0322_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 8:41:56 AM
Creation date
10/18/2011 1:20:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE *& 03-22-m-92 <br />ITEM No o : C INEMEPW q <br />Department Approvals Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section. <br />Hearings <br />Item Description: Kl osner Goertz Homes Inc. request for <br />rezoning from R l to PUD, planned unit <br />development.. general - concept plan approval, <br />vacation of utility easements and approval of <br />Preliminary and final plat at 711 And 725 <br />La rp ent eur . Avenue e <br />Backar und: <br />1s Klosner Goerktz Homes Inc. is proposing to develop a PUD <br />which would divide two parcels of land into 26 lots for <br />construction of 13 one level twin homes (a total of 26 <br />dwelling units)o <br />The Roseville planning Commission unanimously recommended <br />approval of Klosner Goertz Homes Inc. request for rezoning <br />from Rawl to PUD,, approval of a general concept PUD plan, <br />vacation of utility easement and approval of preliminary and <br />final plat at 711 and 725 Larpenteur Avenue with the <br />following conditions: . <br />a . That the Public Works staff review and approve the <br />Engineering plan for grading, drainage, storm ponding , <br />suer, and water* <br />be That the landscape plans be rev ised to reflect the <br />suggested changes as outlined in the staff report. <br />C . That 4 5 feet of additional rightof�way be dedicated <br />for Larpenteur Avenues <br />do That staff investigate the possibility of requiring a <br />maintenance bond to insure proper maintenance of the <br />drainage ponds . <br />es That ter ip or color and f finish be reviewed by City <br />staff. <br />to r ves ■ <br />in Deny the proposal based on the finding that the project would <br />be detrimental to the general health, safety, and welfare df <br />the neighborhoods <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.