My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0308_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0308_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 8:17:52 AM
Creation date
10/18/2011 2:01:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TIMA TOLTZ* KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON <br />AND ASSOCIATES, INC04PORATED <br />on r <br />4 <br />ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS Ism MEWMA T ER <br />AR STf1EET <br />TIT PAUL. MNNESMA 53101 -2140 <br />P# E:G1 42-44= 'PAk:612 "24033 <br />January 29, 1993 <br />W. Steve Galin <br />Public works Director <br />City of Roseville - <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MT 55113 <br />Re: Reroofing of Public Works and Booster Station <br />- Change Order No. lei - Fite Station #3 <br />- Change Order No. 2 - Public works Roof <br />- Change Order No. 3 - Roof Patching of License Bureau <br />TKDA Comm. loo. 10149 <br />Mar Steve: <br />We have received f corn McPhillips Roofing and are forwarding to you bps for the above - <br />referenced project. <br />Change Order No. is fox adding an expansion ,point and reflashing the joint between high and <br />low roof at the Public works Facility. <br />The work of patching the License Bureau was .done as requested, is outside of the contract with <br />McPhillips, is acceptable and should be paid. <br />The work on the Fire Station #3 is complete and the Application for Payment is enclosed with its <br />sun ary sheet. Please note that the cost to McFhihips was $5,017 above the Not to Exceed <br />amount of the C.0. The basis for McPhillips' proposal for this work was based upon our walk- <br />through with Joe Hewett. It was not based upon drawings which due to tuning were prepared <br />afterward. In the course of the existing construction document review and the p aration of <br />TKDA's construction docurnent, it became clear that an expansion joint was required on the east <br />d west walls which am load. bearin to take up the put t` l structural movement. The <br />an � � <br />incorporation of the expansion j <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.