My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0106.ws_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0106.ws_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 7:19:18 AM
Creation date
10/18/2011 4:05:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />xi <br />TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD <br />Mears Park Centre, 230 E Fifth SL, SL Paul, Minnesota 53101 <br />DATE December 23, 1992 <br />To; Technical Advisory Cbmmittee <br />FROM: Fundins and i .0 WIMi7iU <br />Recommended Bikewq and Wdkway Frojec#a for Federal Surface Transportation <br />Frograru Funding <br />The Funding Programming Committee has completed its of the project appEcations <br />submitted by sous governmental agencies for possible inclusion in the 1993 Interim Federal <br />Surface Transportation grogram Funding of Bikeway and walkways. Attached a iistmg of the <br />projects recommended for Federal Funds. A total of eight 8 projects have been selected for <br />finding of the 72 project submittals. federal funding to" $1,739$76. his mpresants ever <br />progra naffing by apprao irr�ately 16%. project priorit ng was based upon criteria developed for <br />the interim p The next solicitation will incorporate changes in the criteria and rating <br />process based upon the committee's resew and evaluation. <br />rionti .ed ranking of the standard bikeway and walkway juts is attached* The committee <br />decided to group all the non - innovative projects into one category for funding purposes. The <br />projects recommended for selection are highlighted. The innovative projects were not given a <br />numerical rating. The committee spent an entire meeting disco ing the meats of each project <br />individually. iteria such as innorativeness, transferability, population served, and how well the <br />project serves a transportation purpose were discussed and evaluated by consensus. The <br />Committee attempted to fund as many innovative projects as possible. The Committee is <br />recommending that the proposer of a funded project be required to submit a report evaluating <br />the effectiveness of the 'new innovation as well as future transferability. <br />Attachments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.