My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_1208_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_1208_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2011 9:05:53 AM
Creation date
10/19/2011 11:03:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Minutes — 11/24103 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 17 <br />reviewed by the City's Development <br />Attorney; Council concurred. <br />Item 3 <br />Discussion included the assessment <br />process of the City, lengthening the term, <br />not lowering the rate; Council concurred. <br />Bullet <br />Discussion of assessment percentage and <br />Points <br />the amount of infrastructure work needing <br />completion; Council concurred. <br />item 4 <br />Discussion of language regarding eminent <br />domain. City Attorney Anderson <br />recommended striking some language and <br />revising to read as follows; Council <br />concurred. <br />Mayor - #4 -use of eminent domain - <br />people more comfortable - CITY <br />AGREED TO CONSIDER - <br />CA -strike "has agreed to," and put "may„ <br />"The use of eminent domain is an <br />available public purpose tool that the City <br />asg [may] consider within <br />the Twin Lakes Redevelopment area, <br />which includes the Allina site, to further <br />the public purposes of the Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Plan. As a last resort, <br />establish fair market value, the City <br />[may] use this tool to aS5ISt A11ina in <br />acquiring the necessary land for their <br />project." <br />Community Development Director <br />Welsch noted that there is no tax <br />increment financing (TIF) proposed in this <br />proposal at all; that it would be based on <br />fair market value at the end of <br />negotiations, which may require use of <br />condemnation. <br />item 5 <br />No comment; Council consensus. <br />Item 6 <br />No comment; Council consensus. <br />Item 7 <br />No comment; Council consensus. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.