Laserfiche WebLink
. Neal Beets <br />City Manager <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />Re.- Letter of August 22, 2003 <br />Dear Mr. Beets, <br />This letter is in response to your letter- dated August 2a 2003. <br />10370 Naples St. NE <br />Blaine, MN 554-49 <br />(952)8 -11CO <br />( 763) 783 -5477 Fax <br />1) As per Council member loo ugh's proposal for a 3 year fixed rate contract with a 3 <br />year extension the rate would have to be greater then the HRG rate for 2006 as <br />specified in their favored nation clause. (2003 rate of $2.25 x CPI -U for 2004 x <br />CPI -U for 2005 x CPI -U for 2006 rate) It therefore is impossible to compute. <br />2) The Mayor's question on ownership of the carts (like the Robbinsdale agreement). <br />gT . � <br />Their contract is over $1 million annually and with extension is a 10 year <br />agreement. If the City of Roseville wants to enter into a 1 million contract for <br />years I am sure we could work out the cart ownership issue. <br />It was my understanding after the meeting that the contract would reflect the same <br />language as HRG matching their rate for 5 years. <br />The rate would be upon delivery of carts this fall $2.25 with a PI -U increase January <br />132004. This rate would he adjusted annually on this date by CPI -U. <br />The existing agreement contained "single sort' collection as an option. It is our <br />recommendation we exercise this option rather them rewrite the entire contracts <br />Profit sharing wasn't included in your RFP specifications and is a hereby moot. <br />I have included the addendum to the contract that works for waste ana g ement. <br />Since y, <br />ary oyum <br />Municipal rketing ager <br />