My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0929_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0929_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2011 9:37:30 AM
Creation date
10/19/2011 4:20:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Date: 09/29/03 <br />Item: f fI F A. <br />Presentations <br />Request for Council Action Residential ec ye ling Contract <br />Date: September 15, 2003 <br />Item NumberiVIR. A. <br />Department Approval Manager Approval <br />Agenda Section <br />Item Description: <br />Consider Changing the City's Recycling Contract with "waste Management <br />� nxent <br />Back ound: <br />At your August 18 meeting, you asked that this item be placed on the e tember 1 � <br />� meeting agenda. Some of <br />you had questions you wanted Waste Management to answer about changing the <br />� � contract. I sent Waste <br />Management a letter asking those questions. See Attachment 1. Waste Management responded ponded with th a letter. <br />See Attachment 2. <br />In addition, the City has received phone and e-mail messages regaTding regarding recycling, See Attachment 3. <br />Discussion: <br />Our current contract with Waste Management continues our existing wo -sort recycling . <br />g yc ling service 1n most of the <br />ity, but provides for a single- stream pilot project in part of the City. <br />The contract addendum suggested. by Waste Management proposes that the it � . <br />� l� � begin c�ty�vlde single - stream <br />recycling this winter. (At your request, the City Attorney has also drafted a contract addendum in ease you <br />decide to move to single - stream recycling inunediatel .{That addendum i s attached hod as Drell. the City Attorney <br />can describe the differences between the addendum Waste Management proposes <br />drafted.) <br />� and the one the City Attorney <br />Financial f rnpact: <br />Single- strewn recycling is more expensive than two -sort recycling, <br />Y g <br />Council Action Requested: <br />Either: <br />1. Fake no action, which leaves the existing recycling contract In place (meaning we continue two sort <br />recycling in most of the City, but we have WM conduct a sin le- stream ilot <br />or <br />g p project in part of the City), <br />4 <br />Approve a motion adopting the Waste Management contract addendum or the addendum drafted by the <br />City Attorney (meam'ng the entire City changes to single-stream recycling • <br />g y g this winter). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.