2003_0922_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 19 20 1 23 4 5 6 27 8 9 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 4 49 50 impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition} the project complies with the Comprehensive plan designation as low- density residential uses. Mr. Paschke stated that the Community Development Staff recommends approval of a 75 square foot variance to Section 1004.01A5 of the Roseville City Code for Scott Santanni to allow the construction of a detached accessory building in the rear yard at 10l9 Sherren Street, subject to the following conditions: a. The detached accessary building being limited to a size of 24 feet by 26 feet or 624 s.quare feet. b. The parcel being limited to a maximum impervious coverage of 8,422 square feet or 30%. c. The detached accessory building being limited to the storage of residential (not commercial) equipment, material, seasonally used recreational vehicle or a seasonally driven vehicle or collectable. d. Submittal of a scaled site plan indicating existing and proposed conditions consistent with the above variance conditions. e. windows being placed on the east and west building wall to break -up the building wall. f. Gutters installed along the eves of the detached accessory building and directed to the parcel's interior yard to reduce impacts to the adjacent residential properties. g. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved plans and variance. Chair Duncan asked ghat the 1 Y2story house upstairs square foot area of the house was (700 square feet for a total of 1 600 — 1 700 square feet). Member Mulder asked what happens if the building (home) changes size? (More accessory structure could be added). Chair Duncan asked for a definition of a standard garage. City planner indicated that no true standard exists; however general axle 24 feet by 26 feet is a good sized two stall garage. Scott Santanni explained that his house has a footprint of 1,030 sq. ff., a breezeway of 108 sq. ft., for an overall size of 13 138 sq. ft. He explained that a 700+ sq. ft. garage should be allowed based on the size of the house. There is no visual impact to the neighbors and not visible from the sides or street and that the building will be the same height as the' existing garage. The main reason for this garage is storage and for a boat, trailer, snowmobile, tractor. Mr. Santanni added that his proposal is well below the 30% coverage (7 %) and less than the 40% rear yard building ( 1,053 sq. ff.), but the homes footprint is too small at this time. Chair Duncan asked if 1,138 sq. ft. was accurate. The City planner indicated that the numbers appeared to be accurate, adding that the information he used in the report was based on Mr_ Sanntanni's submittal. The City planner also indicated that Mr. Santanni could construct an accessory building that was up to the maximum 690 sq. ff. or in light of the desires of the applicant, the Planning Commission could support a 728 sq. ft detached accessory building with a 30 sq. ft variance. Member Stone asked for details of the survey calculations.