2003_0922_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 a. ,Planning Tile 3512: Request by Scott Santanni, 1019 Sherren Street, for 3 a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Section 1004.01A4 and a 4 Variance to Section 1004 *01A5 (Overall Area) and Section 1004.01A6 5 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the Roseville City Code to allow the 6 construction of a 1,007 sq. ft. detached accessory building. 7 8 Chairman Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planning Thomas Paschke to present 9 verbal summary of the staff` report dated September 3, 2003. to Scott Santanni, 1019 Sherren Street, has submitted a proposal to construct a detached accessory 12 building on his lot. The proposed structure, a 30 foot 6 inch by 33 foot (1,007 sq. f1) storage 13 building would be located just north of the existing attached two -stall garage. The sum of the area 14 of an attached garage and detached accessory building =not exceed the size of the house. In this 15 case, the proposed 1,007 sq. ft. detached accessory building when combined with the existing 440 16 sq. ft. attached garage, creates 1,447 sq. ft. of combined accessary building square size, which 17 size is 458 sq. ft greater than the 898 sq. ft. home. 18 The Santanni home was constructed in 1951 and lies on a 28,072 square foot (87 feet by 323 feet) 19 parcel. The home has a foundation size of 989 sq. f1.; a rear yard allowance of 1,053 sq. ft.; and 20 an impervious coverage allowance of 8,422 sq. fl. 1 22 The existing conditions and the proposed accessory building fall well below the maximum 23 impervious surface area afforded the parcel. Dike wise, the proposed detached accessory building 24 is below the size afforded by the Code. However, when combined, the attached garage (440 sq. ff.) and proposed detached accessory building 1,007 sq. ft.) exceed the footprint size of the home 6 (989 sq. ft) by 45$ sq. ft. 27 28 Section 1004.01 A5 reads: "Overall Area: The overall area of attached garage and 9 detached accessory building(s) shall not exceed the exterior dimensional footprint of the o principal structure, excluding any attached garage footprint. 31 32 Section 1 004.01 A4 requires a conditional use permit for an accessory structure exceeding 864 3 square feet in size, up to a maximum of 1,008 square feet, subject to meeting criteria. 34 35 City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the proposal and explained that it is difficult to justify a 36 departure from the strict application of the City Codc allowing the applicant to construct the 37 proposed detached 1,007 sq. ft detached accessory building. Howev , there is justification for 38 reduced sized detached accessory structure, one that is more in beeping with a double stall 39 structure than the triple stall size proposed. Specifically, a detached accessory building 24 feet 40 wide by 26 feet sleep or 624 sq. ft in size would reduce the variance by 379 sq. ft, but more 41 importantly, would afford Mr. Santanni ample storage space for the items stated, and would be in 42 beeping with the structures in the neighborhood and no Conditional Use Permit would be required 43 for a 624 square foot building. 44 45 City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in 46 Section 101 3.01.1) (Conditional Use Permit) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concluded 47 the proposal meets these criteria. Specifically, a detached accessory building is a permitted use in 48 an R- X (district. The proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic or the need for 49 additional public facilities. with proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and landscaping, 50 the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no