My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0922_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0922_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 3:55:20 PM
Creation date
10/20/2011 3:37:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.0 • <br />F <br />5.1 Periodically the Community Development staff reviews Code violations relating to <br />property maintenance to determine whether there are properties in disrepair for an <br />extended period. The staff spends tine attempting to gain compliance during this time <br />on these properties. Generally they have not met the Code because the owner has been <br />unable (physicalIy or financially) or unwilling to comply with the Code. A. Ramsey <br />County Court Citation is one remedy. It allows an impartial third party (Ramsey <br />County judge) to assess the situation and make a ruling. The Community <br />Development Department anticipates the judge will require the property owner to <br />repair or remove the dilapidated section of fencing. <br />5.2 This process has been successfully used in previous years to resolve longstanding <br />nuisance complaint violations. <br />5.3 The staff attempts to work with property owners to bring the structure into compliance <br />(and continue to encourage property owners to repair properties up to the time of a <br />Council hearing). <br />& 1 The Council has requested that each time a County Court Citation is considered to <br />resolve a long standing nuisance case, the Council review the case and provide <br />direction prior to authorizing the City Prosecuting Attorney to proceed. <br />6.2 The City goals within the Comprehensive Plan are to protect and improve property <br />values (Goal 3, 4 and 5; page 6 and, Section 3 ) and to adhere to performance <br />standards which protect the integrity of the housing units and the neighborhood <br />(Policy 6, page g, Section 3). <br />7;1 Staff recommends that the Council direct the staff to work with the city prosecuting <br />attorney to cite (Ramsey County Court citation) the owrter for the specific violations <br />of the Code. <br />7.2 Other options include; 1 ) Igo nothing — allow the violation and complaints to continue. <br />2) Proceed with a City Nuisance Abatement Hearing and repair the fence with city <br />funds, which is slower and takes more staff time. Also, in this case, the property <br />owners could repair the fence at minimal cost by doing the work themselves. If the <br />City were to contract for the repair (and assign costs to the property taxes) it would be <br />much more costly to the property owners. <br />ra # I I IMI 411 MI <br />8.1 By motion, direct the staff to work with the city prosecuting attorney to cite <br />(Ramsey County Court citation) the owner for violation of the Code. <br />% \VictoriakComm \Perrnits�ComplaintsRCA _2199 Cohanse+ Blvd 092203.doc <br />RCA-2199 Cohansey Blvd. Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.