Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager's 2004 Budget Recommendations <br />ante the budget for 2005. No further use of City reserves to balance our <br />budget would be necessary either. <br />On the other hand, if the state does not restore state funding to Roseville <br />in 2005 in any significant amount, by cutting $350,000 in 2004 we <br />would at least be half -way toward the $700,000 in structural changes we <br />need to make in City operations to balance the city's 2005 budget. <br />V. Specific Cuts <br />To reduce City spending by $350,000 we have to cut staf "f and ra rams. <br />. programs. <br />Items like travel, conferences, and training are small items in the big Pic- <br />ture. gp <br />e have colt those items too, but you can't achieve significant cost <br />savings by just cutting those kinds of items, We have to cut much deeper <br />- into staff and programs affecting the public - to reduce the budget b y <br />$350,000. <br />Remember, too, that cutting or delaying capital items does not help bal- <br />ance our operating budget. capital items - like vehicles and street irn <br />provernents - are not funded out of operating revenues' Replacement <br />p g <br />vehicles, for example, are funded out of reserve savings built up h <br />depreciation expenses that have been put aside in special accounts over <br />the useful life of the vehicle. <br />Thus, delaying replacement of a vehicle does not help our operating <br />p g <br />budget i it reduces the drain on our reserves, not on our operating p g e - p ense s . In fact, in many cases replacing a. vehicle actually helps our op- <br />erating <br />budget because new vehicles usually have lower operating n costs <br />than older vehicles. <br />projects Similarly, large capital improvement projects - like street + ects - are <br />. k. p <br />paid for with a combination of special purpose federal grants andspecial <br />purpose state funds along with dedicated city reserves. Delaying a capi- <br />tal project, them, affects these special grants and reserves; it does not <br />help our operating budget. <br />Hence, to reduce spending in the City's operating budget b y $350yOOO7 I <br />estimate we would have to cut staff by 6 FTE's. Because most City staff <br />serve a number of programs, many programs will be affected. But the <br />major cuts are as follows: <br />5 <br />