Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager's 2004 Budget Recommendations <br />Police would function for a second year without a Deputy Police <br />Chief; Administration and the entire city organization would func- <br />tion again without an Assistant city Manager. <br />fo Finance would function more slowly due to the transfer of an FTE <br />to the License Center. License Center operations would improve. <br />Reducing our programming at the Nature Center would he a loss <br />for some school children. Possibly, we can receive even more vol- <br />unteer help from the FORHANC group. Possibly, we can forge a <br />partnership with another agency, such as the Minnesota State <br />Horticultural Society, to help us pay for operating and program <br />costs at the Nature Centen <br />• The Police Department would still operate at full sworn strength <br />(other than the Deputy Police Chien. <br />A restricted outdoor season at the OIL would certainly disappoint <br />speed slaters and some aggressive skate park teenagers, as the <br />closure of the wading Pool would disappoint some care -- givers and <br />children. Fortunately, there are some other places to skate and <br />swim. overall, of the roughly 5,000 programs and services the <br />Parks and recreation Department is proud to sponsor or conduct, <br />approximately 4,900 would still he fully intact and alive. <br />Reducing the number of fire apparatus will trouble some current <br />and former members of the Fire Department. But we will still have <br />lots of apparatus, and on those rare occasions when more appara- <br />tus are needed it is available through mutual aid from other fire <br />departments. <br />Eliminating some insurance coverage puts us at greater risk if a <br />catastrophe strikes. In my experience, using reserves to hack -stop <br />such a highly unlikely event is a good and appropriate alternative <br />and a good and appropriate use of reserves. (It 1s what we did with <br />great success in Mesa.) This approach would allow us to continue <br />to safely invest our reserves and thereby reduce pressure on our <br />tax levy. Yet at the sane time our reserves would be doing "double - <br />duty": they would continue to be an asset earning money and, in <br />addition, we could still liquidate as needed in the unlikely event <br />that a catastrophe strifes. Remember that we still have substantial <br />insurance coverage by paying $200,000 in premiums each year-; <br />I'm not suggesting we go without insurance. I am recommending <br />we rely more on self-insurance (by relying on our own reserves) <br />and less on purchased insurance. we would tap City reserves only <br />12 <br />