My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0915_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0915_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 4:47:27 PM
Creation date
10/20/2011 4:15:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />1.0 BACKGROUND: <br />1.1 On August 18, 2003, the City Council continued the Mogg development proposal to <br />September 15 to allow the City Planner additional time to review and bring forward <br />a recommendation regarding environmental impacts and the need for an <br />Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). <br />Chapter 4410.4300, subpart 19 states the following regarding mandatory EAW review for <br />residential developments: <br />Local governmental unit is the RGU for construction of a permanent or potentially <br />permanent residential development of: <br />250 unattached units or 375 attached units in a city within the seven - county Twin <br />Cities metropolitan area that has adopted a comprehensive plan under Minnesota <br />Statutes, section 473.85, or in a city not located within the seven - county Twin Cities <br />metropolitan area that has filed with the EQB chair a certification that it has <br />adopted a comprehensive plan containing elements listed in the Dotes (see <br />attachment — specifically water - related land use management district). <br />The Guide to Iinnesota Environmental Review Rules developed by the <br />Environmental Quality Board state: "'Regardless of whether a petition is filed, any <br />government unit can order a discretionary EA W if it is determined that the prqiect <br />may have the iDotential for sienWicant environmental effects. runless the aroiect is <br />exempt (part 4410.45411). <br />Exempt Categories: Construction of a severed residential development, no part of <br />which is within a shoreland area, delineated flood plain state or federally designated <br />wild & scenic river district, the Minnesota Diver Project Riverbend area, or the <br />Mississippi headwaters area of: <br />Less than 40 units in a second class city. <br />X3489 RCA PUD Concept 091503 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.