Laserfiche WebLink
Recyclingiii Selected Areas in Relation to Single�Stream <br />Listed in alphabetical <br />Brooklyn P.2rk & HRG population 140,131 <br />They were the first hies to switch to single stream. Set out rates were around 50% before; <br />now they are 71% (Roseville's is 65%). It needed a program to appeal to a rapidly <br />growing, younger population without established recycling habits. Believes single - stream <br />has been effective. Concerned that promised cost savings have fret to materialize. <br />Little Canada population 9,971 <br />It signed a contract with a consortium of haulers including waste Management in 2002 for <br />two stream collection. It has no plans to change that contract. <br />me <br />inneapolis population 382,618 <br />Source separated. It refuses to consider single strum because of concerns about <br />contaminated material. Contract with BFI specifies a residual rate of less than 1%. It has <br />profit sharing and a higher residual rate would cut into profits. <br />Minnetonka population 51,301 <br />It signed a contract with waste Management to switch to two - stream. It has no plans to <br />conduct a single- stream pilot. It is concerned about increased residual rates with single <br />stream and about authenticity of the dent residual rates being reported to it from WM. <br />St. Paul population 287,151 <br />Source separated switching to tiro- stream. It conducted a nationally acclaimed study of <br />recycling collection methods including source separated, two- stream and single stream. <br />Found two- stream with weekly collection to be the best method. It temmnated its contract <br />with waste Management in part because of concerns about WM's processing plant* Just <br />signed a 10-year contract extension in which rates are anticipated to go up only 15% over <br />ten years (waste Management is proposing to increase Roseville rates by 15% in the first <br />year and 3% a year after that). <br />Shoreview population 25,924 <br />Earlier this year waste Management agreed to re -open its contract and lower the rate for <br />two - stream collection. waste Management threatened to walk away from its contract <br />unless Shoreview agreed to switch from a one -day collection to a five -day zones stern <br />similar to Roseville. waste Management needed the changes in order to deal with staff <br />cuts following the loss of the St. Paul contract. <br />