2003_0818_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

7.4 Janice Porter spoke in opposition of the plan stating the eco- system next to the development is already plagued by the encroachments of development at its perimeter and can ill - afford to sustain any further insults to its balance. Janice Porter also submitted a signed petition of 37 residents in opposition of the development located near the preserve (attachment included), 7.5 Peter Pangborn spoke in opposition of the project noted that the staff` report has no maximum house size; feeling the house sire could be as large as the owner would like. Mr. Pangborn feels the Moser Development drawings are misleading in that they illustrate existing properties by reef line measurements compared to wall outlines of the proposed properties (attachment included),. A detailed account of excerpts from Roseville citizens are provided in the minutes of Planning Commission meeting on August 6, 2 7.6 The Commission asked staff how high the retaining wall would be. The City Planner and project developer illustrated the retaining wall will be 4 to 14 feet in height when viewed from the south looping northwest. The gall will not be exposed to neighbors to the east. 7 7 The Conunission stated the setback should be 30 feet, with a 20 foot setback between units. The City Planner indicated the Commission could specify wetland setbacks and sizes of units -not to exceed a maximum footprint size. 7.8 The Commission asked about outbuildings, the City Planner noted that PIED normally does not allow out buildings as a condition of approval. 7.9 Bob Moser, developer for the Nogg proposal, addressed the Commission, stating he has held meetings with the neighbors on the site. The plan has changed substantially over the year due to neighbor concerns, based on their inputs, including the style (two -story design to a single story design) roof pitch, overall height and structure setbacks. Mr. Moser indicated the proposed homes would range from 1400-1850 square feet and approximately 26 feet in height. 7.1 0 The Planning Commission voted (5 -o) to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development `General Concept Plan ", creating a 6 -unit residential PUD development with an underlying zone of R-2, } subject to the conditions listed I the project report and those indicated in Section 7.7 and 7.8. PF3489 RCA PUD Concept 081803 Page 8