2003_0818_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Impervious coverage for the proposed development, including the existing home 3 is estimated at 25,113 sq. ft or 23.6% of the net developable land area ( 106,359 sq. ft). A single family residential development of 4 to 6 lots 5 6 Thomas Pasche illustrated photos of the site and the proposed 20' wide private rive. S 9 Member Pep er asked for details of the retaining gall adjacent to the driveway. Thomas Faschke explained a letter of opposition- from adjoining property owners 12 and an email supporting the project (Salene, August 5, 2003). 13 Bob loser, developer for the Fogg proposal, stated he has field meetings with 14 the neighbors on the site. The plan changed based on their input, including 15 limiting the height to one story and increasing the setback from the east property 16 line to 30 feet. He explained the new retaining galls proposed along the 17 driveway. An excavation limits diagram was explained. Utility plans for surer 18 and water were illustrated, along with storm water run -off. Grass Labe watershed 19 roust approve the plans. A tree plan was illustrated; 20 trees would be removed. 20 He said the project was sensitive and complimentary to the site. The units would 1 be 140G.— 1850 s. f. The units will be 26 feet} with a roof slope of 8/12. From the 2 back half of the units} water would run to the west. 3 4 Bob Moser explained drainage from neighbors across from the Mogg property 5 with no disruption of the neighbor's drainage. 6 7 Member Feper asked if the private street must accommodate a fire truck in the 8 cul -de -sac. Thomas Fasehke explained this is short and has been reviewed by the 9 fire marshal. 30 31 Member Bakernan asked if the staff recommendation, were acceptable (yes). 32 33 Thomas Fasche explained the flexibility needed for porches and patios, allowing 34 reduction of the needs for changes to the FUD. 35 36 Peter Fangborn, 2615 Cohansey, asked for clarification of traffic generation; how 37 many single family lots would be allowed (4 to 6 lots, with up to 25% impervious 38 per lot). He asked for clarification of run off management and asked why such 39 construction would occur in the treed areas. hoes the pond require removal of 40 trees` (watershed will make that determination). 41 42 Chris Kruger, 2615 Cohansey, spoke in opposition to the change in the plan. She 43 referred to Section 9 of the Comprehensive Flan — park section regarding 4 acquiring land for Central Farb. There is little green space left in Roseville. This 5. 45 is not a dilemma in Roseville alone (Burnsville, St. Paul). Add this parcel to the 46 park system. A copy of comments was distributed.