My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0728_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0728_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 10:27:15 AM
Creation date
10/21/2011 10:14:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Minutes — 07/21/03 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 14 <br />parking lot being illuminated. Ms. McCarthy recognized <br />the investment that Roseville Properties had made in their <br />buildings; and concurred with Councilmember Maschka's <br />proposal for expanding the project area, which would <br />provide more illumination and continuity for her property, <br />as well as enhancing the upgrading of the area initiated by <br />Roseville Properties. <br />Councilmember Kough requested clarification of <br />assessment costs; with Ms. Bloom responding <br />accordingly. <br />Councilmember Schroeder reviewed the number of fight <br />fixtures proposed by Excel Energy, opining that there was <br />not a need for the proposed number of fixtures; and <br />expressing his lack of support in the eventual burdening of <br />taxpayers for this ownership and operational expense. <br />Councilmember Klausing expressed his willingness to <br />concur with the consensus of fellow Councilmembers on <br />this issue,. <br />Mr. Schwartz reviewed the twenty -two (22) ornamental <br />lighting projects requested within the City since 1970; the <br />twenty (20) installations approved, some in conjunction <br />with streetscape improvement projects; and recommended <br />review of the City's policy that was developed in the <br />1970's and refine it to create uniformity. <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn stated he would be voting in support of <br />the motion to deny; opining that this issue needed to be <br />addressed with a Special Service District (SSD) and a plan <br />developed that would consider long -term cosh issues. <br />Rolf Call <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Maschka, Klausing, Kough and <br />Kysylyczyn. <br />Nays: None. <br />Maschka. moved, Kysylyczyn seconded, directing staff to <br />review the scope of the area (including B -2 and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.