My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0728_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0728_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 10:27:15 AM
Creation date
10/21/2011 10:14:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Manager's 2004 Budget Recommendations <br />ance the budget for 2005. No further use of City reserves to balance our <br />budget would be necessary either. <br />On the other hard, if the state does not restore state funding to Roseville <br />in 2005 in any significant amount, by cutting $350,000 in 2004 we <br />would at least be half way toward the 7001000 in structural changes we <br />need to make in City operations to balance the city's 2005 budget. <br />LYOUIT-= <br />To reduce City spending by $350,000 we have to cut staff and programs. <br />Items like travel, conferences, and training are small items in the big F ic- <br />F ` F <br />ture. we have cut those sterns too, but you can't achieve significant cost <br />savings by just cutting those kinds of items. we have to cut much deeper <br />- into staff and programs affecting the public - to reduce the budget by <br />$350,000. <br />Remember, too, that cutting or delaying capital items does not help bal- <br />ance our operating budget. CapiW items - like vehicles and street im- <br />provements - are not funded out of operating revenues. Replacement <br />vehicles, for ,example, are funded out of reserve savings built up through <br />. g <br />depreciation expenses that have been put aside in special accounts over <br />the useful life of the vehicle* <br />Thus, it replacement of a vehicle does not help our operating <br />budget -� t reduces the drain on our reserves, not on our operating ex- <br />penses. In fact, in many cases replacing a vehicle actually helps our op- <br />erating budget because new vehicles usually have lower operating costs <br />than older vehicles. <br />Similarly, large capital improvement projects ects - like street projects - are <br />paid for with a combination of special purpose federal grants and special <br />purpose state funds along with dedicated City reserves. Delaying a capi- <br />tal project, then, affects these special grants and reserves; it does not <br />help our operating budget. <br />Hence, to reduce spending in the City's operating budget by $350,000, 1 <br />estimate we would have to cut staff by 6 F TE's. Because most City staff <br />serge a number of programs, many programs will be affected. But the <br />major cuts are as follows: <br />'61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.