My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0728_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0728_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 10:27:15 AM
Creation date
10/21/2011 10:14:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Manager's 2004 Budget Recommendations <br />A. Deduce internal support services staff by 3 FTE's in Administra- <br />tion, Community Development, Finance, Public Works, and <br />Parks and Recreation. $120,000. <br />. Explanation: We would probably have to adopt a <br />Upcol" concept whereby administrative support staff <br />are not assigned to a department but to a "support <br />pool." The "support pool," then, fills the internal <br />administrative needs within these departments <br />such as word processing, filing, phone answering <br />and similar internal support tasks. We would re- <br />spond to the differing daily workloads in each de- <br />partment by deploying more or less staff from the <br />Cipeel" to that department. On busy days, there are <br />more support staff to help that department; on <br />slower days there are fever. <br />B. Cut 2 FTE's in Parks and Recreation, probably relating to cus- <br />todial services and our Mature Center. Net $55P000. <br />. Explanation: Operations staff would clean their own <br />work areas; in customer areas, possibly some in-- <br />crease in existing contract custodial services. <br />ii. Explanation: Mature Center days of operation <br />would be cut from Tuesday- Friday to Thursday and <br />Friday only. volunteers, I hope, will still operate <br />the Mature Center on weekends as they do now. <br />C. Not fill a current vacancy in City maintenance staff and share <br />another maintenance position between two departments, result- <br />ing in a net reduction of 1 FTE. $40,000* <br />i. Explanation: Currently, we have one vacancy each <br />in P &R and PW maintenance staff, for a total of <br />maintenance vacancies. I'm proposing we cut one <br />FTE from these two vacancies, and the two depart - <br />ments would fill but share the remaining position. <br />Even if we cut one currently vaunt position, we <br />would still have a total of 13 front -line FTE's crk- <br />ing year -round on Parrs and Public Works mainte- <br />nance projects supplemented by an additional 17 <br />seasonal employees who work full -tune throughout <br />the summer on Parrs and Public Works mainte- <br />nance projects. <br />lei <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.