2003_0721_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5.2 Staff has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criten'a in motion 1013.01 D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concludes the proposal meets theme criteria. Specifically, a detached accessory building is a permitted use in an 1- I District. The proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic nor the need for additional public - facilities. with proper exterior building t trnent, i ge} and landscaping,, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. Thy appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition} the project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation as low density residential uses. 6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 used on the informadon provided and the findings in Seefion 5 of this .project report, the Community Development Staff" recommends approval of a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for Ms. Mary Drown to allow the construction of a 949 square foot detached Accessory building (garage) in the rear yard of property at 2185 St. Croix Street} subject to the following conditions: A. The detached accessory building being limited to a size not to exceed 949 square feet. The existing building must be removed from the site. B. Gutters being installed to properly direct storm water into the rear yard (east) and away from 2377 County Load B. Windows being installed along the south building gall of the detached accessory building to break up the linear mass as viewed from 377 County Read B. D. The accessory building being setback a minimum of 5 feet from the 91de and rear property line. E. The parcel being limited to a maximum impervious coverage of 5,759 square feet. F. The review and approval of a building permit bung consistent with the approved plans and conditional use permit. G. This conditional use permit shall expire 6 months after approval if a building permit has not been issued (Section 1013.03). 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On July 9, 2003, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public head Y regmxkW the r Brown conditional use permit request. No cifizens were present to adds the Commission and the onnnission had no specific questions of stag` or the applicant except clarification on the required setbacks and the permitted versus conditional use process. PF3493 — RCA 072103 - Page 3 of 4