My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0721_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0721_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 11:42:27 AM
Creation date
10/21/2011 10:54:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
At the last meeting, members discussed if the donors could commit to "Adopt a <br />Sign" at least until December 2005. Each service organization agreed to look <br />after one sign and wash away any graffiti and report major damage to the City. <br />In 2006 the City could decide whether to keep, remove or replace the logos. <br />Participants said they doubted that vandalism or graffiti would be a problem <br />since signs would be placed in well lit, high traffic areas. The signs would be <br />made of the latest technology that resists graffiti and are relatively easy to clean. <br />The group discussed a new design with two panels. The top would say <br />"Welcome Roseville" and the bottom would include the logos. If a portion of <br />the sign was damaged it would be cheaper to replace. If new service <br />organizations wanted to sponsor signs in the future, they could be added more <br />easily. <br />Over the years, the City of Roseville has received many donations from citizens <br />and philanthropic groups. Many of those donations, particularly those from the <br />Central Park Foundation, ELANC, FOR Parks and FOR fund special projects but <br />do not pay ongoing maintenance costs. The "Welcome to Roseville" signs are <br />similar to the improvements to the parks. <br />* Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.