My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0512_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0512_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 2:18:48 PM
Creation date
10/21/2011 2:03:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Mlnutes — 4/28/03 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 30 <br />mid -May and the 2003 — 205 biennium legislative <br />initiatives will also affect discussions. <br />Councilmember Kough opined that he appreciated <br />staff attempting to initiate 2004 budget discussions <br />now; and that City Manager Beets' concerns as to <br />the budget process was valid, but that he had <br />received some direction tonight. Councilmember <br />Kough further opined that he didn't know if it was <br />realistic to anticipate a zero levy increase for 2004, <br />given the construction project; but that it was his <br />goal to work with Finance Director Miller on some <br />items to solve the budget crunch in a reasonable <br />amount of time. <br />Councilmember Schroeder stated that he looked to <br />staff to determine best how to provide anticipated <br />service levels and staffing; but the Council needed <br />additional information from the public and the State <br />to define the budget further; further opining that his <br />preference was for the most reasonable budget <br />available for consideration. <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn opined that staff should be <br />prepared to look at reductions, rather than <br />expansions, of government at a maintenance level or <br />reduction mode. <br />City Attorney Anderson spoke to his experience in <br />working with counties and school districts in their <br />budgeting process; opining that given tonight's <br />discussion, if he were staff he didn't know if he <br />would have clear direction. City Attorney Anderson <br />further opined that the normal public entity budget <br />process started in the previous June, with a budget <br />document presented by Finance to each Department <br />Head, and usually included last year's approved <br />budget, current year actual approved budget and <br />expenditures to -date; and a blank line for each <br />Department Head to anticipate the upcoming yea's <br />needs related to overtime, supplies, training, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.