Laserfiche WebLink
5.2 Section 1 004.01 A3 reads: "Detached Accessory Building Size Limit: Total detached <br />accessory building area shall be limited to 40 of a required rear yard area, up to a <br />rna-ximum size of `864 square feet. The 40 rear yard limitation is calculated by taking <br />the width of the subject lot or parcel and multiplying it by the required rear yard setback <br />or 30 feet, then mullipl ing that number- b .4 or 40%. " The Bentfield parcel is afforded <br />720 square feet of rear yard area based on this Code requirement. The proposal to <br />construct a detached accessory building 728 square feet in size in the rear yard (northeast <br />corner) requires an 8 square feet variance. <br />5.3 Section 1004.01 A6 reads: "Maximum Total Surface Area: Including detached accessory <br />buildings, principal structures, pavement surfaces (asphalt, concrete andlor brick} stop <br />or other parer), the total impervious surface on a residential lot or parcel shall not <br />exceed 30 of the total lot or parcel size." The Benefield parcel is 8,040 square feet in <br />size, affording 2,412 square feet of impervious coverage. The current principal structure <br />( 1,052 sq ff.), attached garage (240 sq. ft.) and driveway ( 1,113 sq. ft.) occupy an <br />estimated 2,405 square feet or 29.9% of impervious area. The proposal to increase the <br />impervious coverage on the parcel to 3487.5 square feet requires a 1,083 square foot <br />�r g ariance or an overa e o 13. 4% (43.4% total coverage). <br />.4 section 1004.01A reads: "Minimum Setbacks: a garden shed andlor accessory <br />building shall be set back a rn inimum of 5 feetfroin a side yard or rear yard and a <br />m ire i uin of 6 eet morn any other building or structure on the same lot or parcel, " The <br />proposed improvement seeks to construct the detached accessory building and additional <br />driveway three feet from the east property line, which location requires a two foot <br />variance. <br />5.5 section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships in <br />the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city council <br />shall have the power-, in a specific arse and after notice andpublic hearings, to vary <br />any such provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent hereof and may <br />M <br />mpose such additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, <br />safety, and general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done* <br />5.6 state statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authorityfor the city to "hear requests or <br />variances from t ire literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where heir strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting o� a variance <br />means theproperty in question cannot be put to a reasonable use r: f used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, <br />if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic <br />considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship � 'reasonable use. for the <br />property gists render the terms of the ordinance...* The board or governing body as' the <br />case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance <br />and to protect" <br />PF347 - RCA 06102!03 - Page 3 of 6 <br />