Laserfiche WebLink
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to grant James <br />ueffer a 70 foot VARIANCE to Section 1004.01 A7 (Location') and VARf.ANCE to Section <br />703.04B2 (Distance Between Driveways) of the Roseville City Code allowing the construction a <br />24 foot by 24 foot (576 sq. ft.) detached accessory building (garage) at 986 Parker Avenue, <br />subject to the following conditions: <br />a. The applicant using the lot's survey and property pins and lased on than <br />supplying a scaled site plan with dimensions for structures and driveway for <br />building permit application, thus allowing the Community Development <br />Department to verify the setbacks, driveway locations as per the variance request,, <br />and size of new structures. <br />bt The detached accessory structure being setback a minimum of 10 feet from the <br />west (side yard) property line and 69 feet from the Parker Avenue property line. <br />C. The joint existing driveway, varying from zero (0) feet to a 2 foot setback from <br />the cast property line, is allowed to remain to a point 75 feet south of the front <br />property tine along Parker Avenue. As part of the building permit application, Mr. <br />Iueffer must provide and show a Counter Recorder's recorded copy of perpetual <br />access easement in favor of the adjoining property owner to the east for access <br />use the joint driveway. <br />d. The existing garage and driveway being removed within one year of the approval <br />date of the variance. The slope and drainage must be redesigned and re- <br />landscaped to reduce and/or retain surface run -off and roof drainage on the <br />I ueffer lot by creating on site infiltration areas. <br />e. A landscape plan bung provided that illustrates how new plantings will visually <br />soften and partially screen the proposed garage from the Parker Avenue frontage. <br />The review and approval of a building permit being consistent with the approved <br />plans and variance. The new building to match the existing building in color <br />and/or materials. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duty seconded by Council <br />Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: <br />and the following voted against: <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />2 <br />