Laserfiche WebLink
Berger could construct the detached accessory structure at the required setback <br />(side or rear yard), but this location would be within the down slope of the yard; <br />require additional fill; add length to the structures foundation; require additional <br />length to the driveway /impervious coverage, and require a Setback permit in order <br />to provide the required 6 foot separation from structured required by the City <br />Code. The Community Development staff has reviewed the existing (immediate) <br />site conditions, grading plan and survey to dieternu'ne if there is a reasonable <br />solution that supports the variance requested. used on our review of the existing <br />situation on the Berger lot and the existing drainage, slopes, and retaining the <br />existing landscape conditions of the parcel and adjoining parcel, staff' has <br />concluded that the most practical and reasonable location is 42 feet from the front <br />property line as indicated in the proposal. Based on our analysis of the situation <br />the Community Development Staff has determined that the property can be <br />made more livable, reduce garage door mass along the street, minimize <br />drainage impacts and slope encroachment, minimize additional impervious <br />surface, and can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls, if a <br />variance is granted. <br />B. Th a pligh t of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the .propel not <br />created by the landowner: victoria Street parcels are older parcels with above <br />normal depth (185 feet), with homes built 50 feet or more from front property <br />lines, and the Berger parcel also has a steep slope which moves in a northwesterly <br />direction which creates design and drainage challenges if constructed at the <br />required location. These facts limit any proposed structural modifications or <br />detached structure ,without an approved deviation (variance) from the City Code. <br />The Community Development Staff has determined that the plight of the <br />landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the <br />landowner (structure placement prior to code, lot width, and topographic <br />issues). <br />'. The variance, is f granted, will not after the essential character of f the locality: <br />The improvements proposed are consistent with how construction activity and <br />building permits have been issued in the past for this neighborhood. Further, Mr. <br />Berger's detached accessory structure will be set back 42 feet from the property <br />line adjaccnt victoria Street while the home to the north is setback 30 feet from <br />the victoria Street properly. The Community Development Staff has <br />d.etered that this variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character <br />of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general <br />welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br />6.1 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report <br />staff recommends approval of a VARLkNCE to Section 1004.01A7 of the Roseville City <br />Code for Kenneth Berger, allowing the construction of a detached accessory building in <br />PF3465 - RCA 06/02/03 Page 4 of 6 <br />