2003_0602_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

the front yard, 17.73 feet from the principal structure and 40 feet from the front property line for property located at 3036 victoria Street, subject to the following conditions: A The applicant using the lot's survey to supply the Building Department with a scaled site plan with dimensions for detached accessory building and added driveway for building permit application, thus allowing the Community Development Department to verify the setbacks, driveway locations as per the variance request, and size of the new structure. B The detached accessory structure being setback a minimum of 40 feet from the east (front yard) property line and 5 feet from the south (side yard ) property line. The proposed detached accessory building being limited to a size not to exceed 24 by 26 feet or 624 square feet. D The accessory structure having the door of entry facing north to reduce visual impact along victoria Street. Gutters being installed on the detached accessory building (garage) where appropriate, to properly direct drainage away from the adjacent (south) parcel. The review and approval of a building permit being consistent with the approved plans and variance. The new building to match the existing building in color and/or materials. 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On May 7, 2002, the Roseville planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the request by Mr. Berger. At the hewing Mr. Ralph wtthowski, and Mr. George Meiling Jr., spoke in opposition to the request. An e-mail from Mr. James Dolan, 3055 victoria Street, supported the request. 7.2 Mr. Berger as well as the City Planner answered specific questions from the Commission regarding options, proposed impact, reasonableness and practicality of the request. Three of the Planning Commissioners determined that the request could not meet the variance criteria established by law, thus they would not support the request. The remaining two onmissioners concluded that the request did meet the criteria established by law and supported the request (minutes attached). 7.3 The Roseville Manning Commission voted (3-2) to recommend denial of the request by Kenneth Berger, 3 036 victoria Street, based on the findings that options exist that allow construction of a detached or attached garage that would not require a variance. PP3465 MCA 06/02/03 Page 5 of 6