My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0630_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0630_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 3:02:21 PM
Creation date
10/21/2011 2:49:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
decisions based on technical knowledge or professional judgments rather than planning or <br />policymaking. <br />mioi tM.5rim, -I I <br />There are several important factors that roust be looked at. First of all, you must look at the <br />decision being made. Discretionary 0 can apply to all types of decisions in manor <br />different areas inciud.ing, but not limited to, land use, personnel} permits and licensing, and <br />streets and roads (including but not limited to, street construction, inspection or maintenance <br />policies or plans and decisions related to the signing of streets and roads). Discretionary <br />immunity can also apply to decisions related to capital expenditures and use of staff and policies <br />related to responses to emergencies. <br />Another factor that must be considered is who is making the decision. The Higher up you go the <br />easier it is to prove the decision was made in a policy making or planning level. However, not all <br />decisions made by the city council, mayor or city administrator are automatically entitled to <br />discretionary immunity. Similarly, some decisions made by lower level employees may also be <br />discretionary. Tile operative principal is that statutory discretionary immunity protects planning <br />level decisions. <br />Another factor that courts took at to determine whether or not a decision is at the "'planning <br />level9i is whether or not the decision or policy involves a weighing of social, political, economic <br />or safety considerations. A good example of a discretionary decision would be a city's snow <br />plowing policy. Many cities have such policies and they frequently involve the weighing of <br />social, political, economic or safety considerations. Social factors would include the effect of <br />salt, sand and chemicals on the environment, the need for people to get to work or school year <br />round and providing access to all citizens to all city facilities. Political factors may include <br />voters' expectations of a certain level of services, downtown. merchants" expectations of service, <br />and <br />voters' expectations to be able to park their car on the stmt. <br />In addition, snow plowing policies almost always involve the weighing of safety considerations, <br />including the safety of a plow operator and the safety of the general public. For safety reasons, <br />cities may schedule particular times when snow removal should be done and place restrictions on <br />the number of hours that a plow operator may operate a ploy without taking at least ten to twelve <br />hours off between shifts. Finally, snow plowing policies frequently involve a weighing of <br />economic considerations such as the budget for snow removal and whether or not the city will <br />authorize over time and the city's long term need to purchase and maintain snow removal <br />equipment. <br />Are Where Reasons other than Discretionary Immunity for a City to Engage in and Keep <br />Records of Policy and Planning Decisions? <br />Yes. First and foremost keeping records of policy and planning decisions helps implement the <br />policy or plan and helps evaluate implementation and effectiveness of the policy or plan. For <br />instance, maintenance policies may provide guidelines for a public works operation. They <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.