Laserfiche WebLink
If the activities of the new arrangement are significantly different than other city operations — for <br />instance, if there is a new joint powers agreement for ambulance services that requires Medicare <br />bil1mg — then a separate accounting function may make sense. <br />Location and logistics <br />As sting decisions are made and depending on the purchase of any new equipment, there may <br />need to be some provisions made for locating resources. One consideration is whether it is <br />important for the joint activities to operate out of a single location, or if it is fine for equipment <br />or staff to be spread out among the cities involved. <br />In a joint powers arrangement* and perhaps even under a "service contract ' approach, it may be <br />desirable to identify the operation in a way that conveys to the public that it's a cooperative <br />effort. E.g., even though legally it #s the City of Mosquito Heights that's providing police <br />services to the City of Frostbite Falls, it might be desirable to call it the Mosquito Heights — <br />Frostbite Falls Police Department. <br />Liability <br />In any-cooperative arrangement, you ideally want to avoid creating situations where each party <br />must respond independently to claim arising from cooperative activities. if that happens it can <br />gut the parties into conflict with each other, and even into litigation agt each other, when a <br />liability ciaim occurs. <br />In a consolidated service, it works hest for the joint board to carry its own liability coverage. <br />The coverage should be structured to protect the constituent cities as well as the joint entity. <br />(LMCIT does this automatically when covering a joint powers entity.). <br />Under a service contract approach, it worm best for the city providing the service to carry the <br />liability risk and coverage, since that city controls how the service is provided and therefore is in <br />a position to control that liability risk, The "provider' city Would also agree contractually to <br />defend and indemnify the "purchaser' city for claims arising from activities under the mice <br />agreement. <br />Under a mutual aid approach, L IT generally recommends that the city receivin <br />h g the <br />assistance assume the liability; i.e., the receiving city agrees to defend and indemnify the city <br />providing the assistance for liability claims that might arise. The mutual aid agreement would <br />also provide that the city providing the assistance is under the direction and control of the city <br />receiving the service. Again, the idea is to make it clear w'ho ' s in charge, and to have the party <br />that's in charge bear the liability risk. <br />Police operations <br />When combining police operations, them are a few special issues to consider, <br />Do any of the cities have part -time officers? <br />Will the new department have part -time officers? <br />What will be the policy on personal equipment, such as weapons, uniforms, body armor, <br />etc.? (will the officer purchase it or is it supplied, etc.)? <br />4 <br />