Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota law. More information about a city "s responsibilities for benefit continuation is found <br />in LM IT Risk M anagernent Information: Minnesota and COBRA Continuation Coverage and <br />LM IT Risk Management Infermation: Retirm: Continuation of Coverage. Detaiied <br />information shout the application of COBRA is available on the I aguelps web site at <br />www-1nmc.orWhrL cobrainan cfm. <br />How should the city determine which positions to <br />A. Carefully consider implementing a hiring freeze. <br />A city may want to consider implementing a hiring freeze in lieu of layoffs. A hiring freeze is <br />usually implemented across -the -board with few or no exceptions. In other words, any <br />employee who retires or otherwise leaves employment with the city is not replaced. The down <br />side of this type of prom 'is that the vacancies can occur In jobs that are sorely needed by <br />the city. For example, if the city operates a hospital or nursing home and registered nurses are <br />scarce to begin with, it may be difficult for the city to leave a position vaunt, or, if the city <br />has a one - person job class with special expertise such as the City Engineer or City Attorney, it <br />may be difficult to `"do without' that function. In some cases, the city can contract out for the <br />work, but this may not result in any cost savings. <br />If the city wishes to implement a hiring freeze but include some exceptions to the freeze, it <br />should identify the exceptions up front (either by individual position or by general guidelines <br />before unplementing the freeze. when identifying the exceptions to the freeze, the city should <br />document the business reasons that these positions will be exempted. This will help the city <br />avoid perceptions of favoritism and help defend claims of discrimination and grievance <br />arbitrations. <br />B. Carefully consider which positions to layoff. <br />A city should rely on business reasons to decide which ernployce(s) to layoff. From a legal <br />perspective, state and federal law prevent employers from any employment practice that <br />would discriminate against or have a significant `adverse i we" on any class of people <br />protected by those laws (e.g., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Minnesota Human Rights Act). <br />From a management perspective, a city should not use a layoff to deal with employee <br />performance issues. It is possible that the courts or an arbitrator may see this as an unfair <br />labor practice, a deception, or a wrongful discharge. <br />With or without the existence of policies and past practices, the city must carefully think <br />through how a layoff is to be accomplished. Once the city determines .which job class es will <br />be affected, senionty (years of ser ice ) with the city is often used to determine who will <br />actually be laid, off. ]=However, defining `seniority" can be tricky, For example, at YouT city: <br />Igo part time years of service equal full time years of service or should part time service be <br />prorated` Igo prior years of service count for employees who are rehired? Hoes timespent on <br />a leave of absence count tow � p <br />and seniority. (Federal law says that time spent on leave covered <br />by the Family and Medical leave Act and/or for qualified military leave for traini <br />duty does.) n or active <br />g <br />-3. <br />