My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0630_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0630_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 3:02:21 PM
Creation date
10/21/2011 2:49:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition to seniority, a city should conceder which employees hold a license (class A <br />wastewater operator, building official, commercial drivers license, etc.) or have special <br />training that may be essential to the provision of certain services to the public. If an employee <br />is less senior than others, but happens to be the only one qualified to perform a necessary <br />function, including that employee in the layoff may not be an option. <br />For those cities with public swi mrrring pools or water parks, it is important to remember the <br />sing requirements associated with operating those kinds of facilities. The Minnesota <br />Department of Labor and Industry OIL prevents lifegauds under age 18 from supervising <br />other lifeguards. DOLI has also indicated that said supervisor cannot be a volunteer, but must <br />be a lifeguard employed by the city. In addition, there are rules from the Department of <br />Health that play a role in the city's staffing of such facilities. <br />As the city is going through the process of determining which employees to include in the <br />layoff, it is important to remain aware of what the resulting layoff group is looking like. For <br />example, if the criteria the city is using to determine who will be laid off results in only <br />employees over 50 being impacted, the criteria should be revisited. Likewise, if the layoff <br />group appears to be comprised mainly of women of childbearing age or includes only the <br />employees who recently tried to organize a union, the city should rethink the criteria being <br />used. <br />Finally, the city needs to consider employees who may currently be away from their jobs with <br />the city for whatever reason (family leave, military duty, etc.). If the layoff' will impact <br />employees who are on a medical related (or other) leave of absence it is important to work <br />with the city attorney. Each situation may be covered by a variety of state and federal laws <br />C,11NM 0 <br />encans with Disabilities Act, Minnesota Human Rights Act, Workers Compensation, <br />Family and Medical Leave Act, etc.) and should be considered on a case -by -case basis. <br />C. <br />Some policies or union contracts may specifically permit employees with more seniority to <br />&Gb pI7 employees in equal or lower job classes and assume their jobs to avoid being laid off. <br />However, it is more common to find layoff lanL 'fie an a contrast that specifics that layoffs <br />will be done according to seniority within a job class. This by itself would not give <br />employees " ;humping rights. "' <br />D. Review existing contracts. <br />A city may have staffing responsibilities related to certain contracts and programs-. For <br />example, the Minnesota Departriaent of Building Codes and Standards has contracts with <br />many city building departments to perform plan review and/or inspections of public buildings. <br />These contracts are based on two criteria: the city must employ a certified building official <br />and roust have adequate staff' to provide these services. A layoff may cause a city to be out of <br />compliance with such a contrad. Other city contracts such as those for police and fire <br />services may have solar provisions. <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.