Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE ,CITY OF ROSEVIIi,F <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 2nd day of June, 2003, at 6:30 p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member <br />introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION loo. <br />I�I�I�INfiififfJJJJJJJJJJJJJ��irtN l��:x <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 70 FOOT VARY E <br />To SECTION 1004.01A7 AND A VARLANCE To SECTION 70104B2 of THE <br />RO EVI CITY CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />986 PARKER AVENUE (IMF 3469) <br />WHEREAS, Jaines [ ueffer has requested a variance to Section 1004.01 A7 (Location) <br />and Section 703.04132 (Distance Between Driveways) of the Roseville City Code to allow the <br />construction of a 24 foot by 24 foot (576 sq. ft.) detached accessory building (garage) and to <br />share a driveway between 896 and 890 Parker Avenue; and <br />WHEREAS, the Iueffer parcel is located at 896 Parker Avenue and legally described as; <br />Frankson 's Garden Plateau ex E. 85 f t ;; Lot 4 and all of Lot 5, Blk <br />(VERIFYLEGAL) <br />PID: 14-29-23-21-0080 <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.01 A7 of the Roseville City Code does not allow an accessory <br />building to be located in a front yard; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Iueffer seeks allowance to place (construct) a detached garage 69 feet <br />from the property line adjacent to Parker Avenue or an encroachment of 70 feet into the front <br />yard; and <br />WHET EA , Section 703.04E requires driveways to be setback a min8irnurn of 5 fee <br />from a side yard property lire; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. I ueffer seeks allowance to share a driveway with the property at 890 <br />Parker Avenue; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission Meld the public hearing regarding the <br />ueffer variance requests (Section 1004.01 Ai & 703.04E2) on May 7, 2003, and recommended <br />(40) approval of the request, based on findings ndin,gs outlined in Section 5 and conditions of Seettori <br />of the project report dated May 7, 2003. <br />