Laserfiche WebLink
Now THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to grant .lames t <br />e <br />I ueffer a io foot VARIANCE to Section 1 004.01 A7 (Location) and VARIANCE to Section <br />703.04B2 (Distance Between Driveways) of the Roseville City Code allowing the construction a <br />74 foot by 24 foot (576 sq. ft.) detached accessory building ( at 986 Farber Avenue, <br />subject to the following conditions: <br />a. The applicant using the lot's survey and property pins and based on that, <br />supplying a scaled site plan with dimensions for structures and driveway for <br />building permit application, thus allowing the Community Development <br />Department to verify the setbacks, driveway locations as per the variance request. <br />and size of new structures. <br />b. The detached accessory structure being setback a minimum of 10 feet from the <br />west (side yard) property line and 69 feet from the Farber Avenue property line. <br />. The joint existing driveway, varying from zero (0) feet to a 2 foot setback from <br />the east property line, is allowed to remain to a point 75 feet south of the front <br />property line along parker Avenue. As part of the building pern3it application} Mr. <br />ueffer must provide and show a Count} Recorder's recorded copy of a perpetual <br />access casement in favor of the adjoining property owner to the cast for access <br />use the joint driveway. <br />d. The existing garage and driveway being removed within one year of the approval <br />date of the variance. The slope and drainage must be redesigned and re- <br />landscaped to reduce and/or retain surface run -off and roof drainage on the <br />lueffer lot by creating on site infiltration areas. <br />e. A landscape plan being provided that illustrates how new plantings will visually <br />soften and partially screen the proposed garage from the Parker Avenue frontage. <br />The review and approval of a building permit being consistent with the approved <br />plans and variance. The new building to match the existing building in color <br />and/or materials. <br />The motion for r the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member and upon vote being taken thereon} the following voted in favor: <br />and the following voted against: <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />