2003_0310_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

reviewed by the City's consultant. A copy of his response is attached. 7.7 Site lighting could be an issue for the adjacent property owners and neighborhood. The onnnunity Development Department has not reviewed the site lighting plan. It will need to meet the minimum standard of 0.5 foot candles at the property line. All lighting fixtures must be cut-off/downcast type. 7.8 City Staff has reviewed the placement of mechanical equipment. Given the proposed roof peak types it is assumed that heating, cooling, and ventilating equipment, specifically air conditioning units need to be affixed as wall units to the building facade, placed on the ground, or placed within roof cavities. Those units that are ground units should be centrally placed in the courtyard and 100% screened from view. Should an emergency generator be contemplated for senior housing/retail building, the plans must indicate the proposed location and the generator must meet all applicable State decibel levels. 7.9 Because of the sensitivity of residential areas and adjacent property owners, construction hours must be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. weekdays and 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. weekends and holidays as stipulated in the Roseville City Code. 7.10 The City Staff will work with Presbyterian domes and their contractor to take down and bury the electrical and utility service lines that surround the site. Hamline Avenue has a higher voltage line that still may be buried along the project frontage. 7.11 The City has adequate sanitary sewer, storm water, and waternnain in place to support the development project. The Public works Department and the Rice Creep watershed, prior to Final Development Plan consideration, must review and approve these plans. The site plan indicates (estimated) an impervious surface coverage of 140,000 to 150,000 square feet or 60 70% and because of this, a surface water storage pond is necessary, and is shown in the courtyard as an amenity. 7.12 Combining these two developments through purposeful design, the development meets staff guidelines suggested in the Neighborhood Enhancement report utilized by the Community Development Department. The applicants may request a Community Enhancement grant (from funds provided to the City from a Metropolitan Council grant) to improve the public boulevard street Fees, vegetation, and sidewalk amenities. 7.13 The proposed redevelopment project will be staged with the east portion of the shopping center being razed first, allowing tenants to remain in the west portion while Sunmerhouse is under construction. Upon completion of Summerhouse, tenants will vacate the wrest portion of the shopping center and the rernaining structure will be razed and completion of site improvements will occur. 8.0 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: 8.1 The design of Summerhouse should be compatible with the general context and human scale of PF3421 — INCA Concept Plan - 031003 Page 8 of 10