2003_0310_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

the neighborhood for both architecture design and building materials. Summerhouse incorporates a specially designed hip roof to lower overall height and has added other architectural elements to further enhance each structure and reduce the visual mass of the building. This could include different sets of windows, similar facade materials and treatments, contextually matching brick, and dormers. 8.2 A conceptual landscape plan must be submitted and incorporate plantings within throughout the site, especially within the street frontages and in the courtyard. Boulevard trees must be consistent with the Street Tree Master Plan. Careful design must be given to the choice of screening used between the parking lot and the nearby apartment complexes and the nearby single family residential properties. 8.3 The Public works Department is currently reviewing the grading, drainage, and utility plans proposed with the General Concept Plan submittal. All plans, including the location of fire hydrants and utility services connections, require the approval of the Public Works Department. 8.4 All buildings, debris, and any soil contamination must be removed from the site prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8.5 Signage must be an integral part of the architectural plans and sign banding and monument slgnage locations must be designated on the site, and meet all size and setback requirements. 8.6 Sharing of parking and access must be accomplished by legal document binding all three lots. 8.7 Dedication of land for right -of -wags and any pond or utility easement required by the Watershed must occur prior to the issuance of building permits. 8.8 Because this is a subdivision plat, the City "s park "cash -in -lieu" of dedication will be require for this development. Parr dedication requirements are required to be reviewed by the Parr and Recreation Commission, with a formal recommendation being received before final Council approvals are granted. 9.0 PLANNING COMMISSION OI IDE ATION: 9.1 in February 5, 2003, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Presbyterian Homes request. At the hearing the Cormnission asked a number of questions of staff and the applicant regarding the proposal. Specifically, the Commission sought clarity on increased traffic, parking, commercial use, and the three lot subdivision. 9-2 Three citizens addressed that Commission also seeping additionai information providing comments to the Commission on the proposed redevelopment plan. 9.3 The Plying Commission voted to recommend (7-0) approval of the pre] m* plat, rezoning, and general concept plan request by Presbyterian Homes to redevelop the Hnline Shopping Center into a four story, 95 senior rental units, with 14,000 square feet of main floor PF3421 — RCA Concept Plan - 031 003 Page 9 of l o